Dartmouth College recently settled a lawsuit with regarding a student who was injured in a skiing accident that occurred while she was taking a skiing class. Apparently, the student skied into a tree during class. She was not wearing a helmet and was just a beginner. The student remained in a coma for 6 months before dying. This was a confidential settlement. Although there was probably an element of assumption of the risk in this case, the fact that the instructor did not have a beginning student wearing a helmet probably is what caused the defendant to agree to a settlement. Maryland Personal Injury Lawyer
Recently in Personal Injury Category
What is your life worth? According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), researchers concluded that the ""value of a statistical life"" in America is $6.9 million, which is approximately $1 million less than 5 years ago. Five years ago the average American life was worth $7.8 million. How is this possible? Is this decline the result of the recession?
Will this statistic effect the average American in any way? It might. When policy makers evaluate regulations they take costs and benefits into account, just like the average person. ""The less a life is worth to the government, the less the need for regulation."" For example, a hypothetical regulation that costs $18 billion to enforce but will prevent 2,500 deaths is up for debate. At $7.8 million per person (the old figure), the lifesaving benefits outweigh the costs. But at $6.9 million per person, the rule costs more than the lives it saves, so it may not be adopted. (AP, www.foxnews.com, 7/11/08)
So how does the EPA calculate a person's worth? Is it by their impact on society? The number of people they help? The number of people who depend on them? No, economists analyze payroll statistics and opinion polls to determine how much risk a person is willing to take for a price. The verdict Americans are willing to take higher risks for a lower price. But the EPA encourages people not to think of this as a price tag on life. Is everything in America losing value? The American dollar isn't doing well in the International market and the stock market, the housing market, and now the American life, according to the EPA, are declining in value.
This hot topic is being debated by government agencies, officials, and businesses around the country. Do the costs of making changes to automobiles, inventing new medical technology, and protecting our environment outweigh the value of life? Why don't we consider life priceless?
Will this statistic effect the average American in any way? It might. When policy makers evaluate regulations they take costs and benefits into account, just like the average person. ""The less a life is worth to the government, the less the need for regulation."" For example, a hypothetical regulation that costs $18 billion to enforce but will prevent 2,500 deaths is up for debate. At $7.8 million per person (the old figure), the lifesaving benefits outweigh the costs. But at $6.9 million per person, the rule costs more than the lives it saves, so it may not be adopted. (AP, www.foxnews.com, 7/11/08)
So how does the EPA calculate a person's worth? Is it by their impact on society? The number of people they help? The number of people who depend on them? No, economists analyze payroll statistics and opinion polls to determine how much risk a person is willing to take for a price. The verdict Americans are willing to take higher risks for a lower price. But the EPA encourages people not to think of this as a price tag on life. Is everything in America losing value? The American dollar isn't doing well in the International market and the stock market, the housing market, and now the American life, according to the EPA, are declining in value.
This hot topic is being debated by government agencies, officials, and businesses around the country. Do the costs of making changes to automobiles, inventing new medical technology, and protecting our environment outweigh the value of life? Why don't we consider life priceless?
In Utah, the State Supreme Court allowed a lawsuit to proceed forward wherein a 7 year old boy suffered a skull fracture after being hit in the head with a hockey stick by another player. The justices ruled that the older boy, who struck the victim, was less likely to understand and accept the possibility of causing serious injury. The lawsuit seeks damages for medical bills and pain and suffering. The insurance company defending the case claims that the case was not an accident.
The Salt Lake Tribune 1/9/08
