<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Maryland Personal Injury Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009-12-14:/56</id>
    <updated>2010-03-05T14:05:52Z</updated>
    <subtitle><![CDATA[Information provided by Foran &amp; Foran, PA.]]></subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.25</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Slip and Fall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/03/slip-and-fall.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.952</id>

    <published>2010-03-05T14:00:46Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-05T14:05:52Z</updated>

    <summary>If a person has no reasonable alternative, he is not expected to not use his own property just because he knows of a dangerous condition. Look at Roundtree v. Lerner Development Co., 52 Md. App. 281 (1982). Assumption of the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John R. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Slip and Fall" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="alternatives" label="alternatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="slipandfall" label="slip and fall" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Calibri">If a person has no reasonable alternative, he is not expected to not use his own property just because he knows of a dangerous condition. Look at Roundtree v. Lerner Development Co., 52 <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Md.</st1:place></st1:State> App. 281 (1982). Assumption of the risk will not apply if there is no reasonable alternative. Prosser on Torts suggests that if there is really only one effective choice it is not a choice at all so there is no voluntary assumption of the risk. Another example is where a tenant is injured because of a defective toilet seat, there is no reasonable alternative. See Sacks v. Pleasant, 253 <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Md.</st1:place></st1:State> 40, 251 A.2d 858 (1969). Often the defense will try to say that the Plaintiff created the dangerous situation by doing something he should not have done.<a href="http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-premises-liability-lawyer/Premises-Liability-Accidents.html">Maryland Slip and Fall Lawyer</a></font></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Medical Malpractice</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/02/medical-malpractice-1.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.859</id>

    <published>2010-02-08T15:52:07Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-23T18:15:05Z</updated>

    <summary>$ 4.4 million dollars was awarded to a South Carolina family because a girl died after sustaining injuries at birth. Apparently the baby was in fetal distress and the physicians did not act quickly enough. As a result, the girl...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John R. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medical Malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="cerebralpalsy" label="cerebral palsy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="infant" label="infant" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="malpractice" label="malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="medical" label="medical" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div>$ 4.4 million dollars was awarded to a South Carolina family because a girl died after sustaining injuries at birth. Apparently the baby was in fetal distress and the physicians did not act quickly enough. As a result, the girl suffered from cerebral palsy. Proper monitoring of fetal monitor strips and recognizing dangereous situations is very important for a physiican to live up to the required standard of care in the medical community. Although Maryland has a cap on what is called non economic damages, a life care plan for an injured infant at birth can reflect significant monetary damges just to take care of the baby for life. <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com">Learn more about&nbsp;Cerebral Palsy &amp; Medical Malpractice</a>.</div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Car Accident on Ice or Snow</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/02/car-accident-on-ice-or-snow.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.858</id>

    <published>2010-02-08T15:49:27Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-23T18:15:48Z</updated>

    <summary>There are several reported Maryland cases regarding automobile accidents on ice or snow. They include Larkins v. Balt. Transit, 249 Md. 305; Billmeyer v. State f/u/o Whiteman, 192 Md. 419; Wolfe v. State f/u/o Brown, 173 Md. 103; and Trusty...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John R. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Auto Accidents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="caraccident" label="car accident" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ice" label="ice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="snow" label="snow" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[There are several reported Maryland cases regarding automobile accidents on ice or snow. They include Larkins v. Balt. Transit, 249 Md. 305; Billmeyer v. State f/u/o Whiteman, 192 Md. 419; Wolfe v. State f/u/o Brown, 173 Md. 103; and Trusty v. Wooden, 251 Md. 294. A person must use reasonable care when driving on ice or snow. This could include reducing speed and being aware of longer stopping distances. <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com">Car Accident on Ice or snow</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Slip and Fall Evidence</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/02/slip-and-fall-evidence.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.841</id>

    <published>2010-02-04T14:34:32Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-23T18:24:01Z</updated>

    <summary>Slip and Fall. The case law in Maryland suggests that in order to prevail on a slip and fall case where liquid has been left on the floor one must prove how long it had been there. It is not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John R. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Slip and Fall" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="slipandfallevidence" label="Slip and Fall Evidence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.foranlaw.com">Slip and Fall</a>. The case law in Maryland suggests that in order to prevail on a slip and fall case where liquid has been left on the floor one must prove how long it had been there. It is not as simple as just saying there was liquid on the floor. There must have been sufficient time for the occupier of the property to observe and clean up the liquid. It may not be enough to say the liquid was dirty because there may not be any inferences that can be drawn from mere dirty liquid. If there were footprints in the liquid or other evidence to suggest length of time on the floor, perhaps one could win such a case. One of the important cases in this regard is Manns v. Giant of Maryland, LLC at 871 A. 2d 627, 161 Md. App. 620.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Drowning Victim at Beach</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/02/drowning-victim-at-beach.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.832</id>

    <published>2010-02-02T19:21:13Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-23T18:24:52Z</updated>

    <summary>Apparently the city of Miami has agreed to pay $ 5 million to the family of a man who drowned. He was attempting to save a woman who had been caught in a riptide. Florida has case law that suggests...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>John R. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Wrongful Death" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="beach" label="Beach" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="death" label="Death" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="drowning" label="Drowning" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[Apparently the city of Miami has agreed to pay $ 5 million to the family of a man who drowned. He was attempting to save a woman who had been caught in a riptide. Florida has case law that suggests cities have a duty to advise beachgoers of dangerous tide conditions they either knew about or should have known about. Unfortunately, the city did not have lifeguards or any posted signs at the location of the drowning. In Maryland, there would be a cap on non economic loss damages so this type of settlement might not be possible. Maryland would also address the concept of tort immunity and a distinction between governmental and proprietary function would have to be addressed. <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com">Drowning at beach</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Insurance Company Can Refuse Payments</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/01/insurance-company-can-refuse-payments.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.819</id>

    <published>2010-01-29T14:09:40Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-23T18:27:25Z</updated>

    <summary> An insurance company can refuse payments if their insured is not cooperative in the defense of a case. There are numerous cases on this subject but the basis for the proposition can be found in The Maryland Code, Insurance...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Insurance Companies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="insurance" label="insurance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="noncooperation" label="non cooperation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="prejudice" label="prejudice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="refusal" label="refusal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[ An insurance company can refuse payments if their insured is not cooperative in the defense of a case. There are numerous cases on this subject but the basis for the proposition can be found in The Maryland Code, Insurance Article, 19-110. The cases suggest that the right to refuse payment derives from the fact that the insurance company has been prejudiced in their ability to properly defend the case. Prejudice, therefore, becomes the real issue in these cases. If, for example, the accident is a simple rear end accident where liability is virtually not in question, the suggestion of non cooperation might not apply because liability is often stipulated anyway. Moreover, if the defendant/insured really cannot offer any testimony regarding the injuries of a party at the scene of the accident, there can hardly be any prejudice under those circumstances either. Thus, the insurance company cannot just arbitrarily deny coverage of a claim because the insured failed to cooperate if the failure is inconsequential anyway. In order to invoke this defense, the insurance company must prove that the failure of cooperation has, in a significant way, precluded or hampered it from presenting a legitimate jury issue. <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com">Maryland Auto Accident Lawyer</a>.]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Large verdict in malpractice case</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/01/large-verdict-in-malpractice-case.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.796</id>

    <published>2010-01-20T17:36:59Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-20T17:40:33Z</updated>

    <summary>A Texas jury recently awarded $ 4 million to a man who suffered significant injuries from a wrongfully performed bowel operation. The physician failed to detect a leaking bowel. As a result, the patient had to have most of his...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medical Malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="error" label="error" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="maryland" label="Maryland" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="surgical" label="surgical" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Times New Roman">A <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Texas</st1:place></st1:State> jury recently awarded $ 4 million to a man who suffered significant injuries from a wrongfully performed bowel operation. The physician failed to detect a leaking bowel. As a result, the patient had to have most of his small bowel removed. If you or a loved one has been the victim of medical malpractice, please call one of our attorneys for a free consultation. Remember, a bad result does not necessarily mean there was medical malpractice. Medicine is not a perfect science. However, if there is a breach of the standard of care required for a particular procedure and damage results, one is entitled to file a medical malpractice claim. If you or a friend has suffered injury as a result of medical malpractice please call one of our attorneys for a free consultation. <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-medical-malpractice-lawyer/maryland-medical-malpractice-lawyer.html">Maryland Medical Malpractice Lawyers</a></font></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Large settlements in auto accident cases and the differences in jurisdictions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2010/01/large-settlements-in-auto-accident-cases-and-the-differences-in-jurisdictions.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2010://56.767</id>

    <published>2010-01-12T20:07:06Z</published>
    <updated>2010-01-12T20:11:12Z</updated>

    <summary>http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-auto-accident-lawyer/what-to-do-after-an-accident.htmlIn an accident involving a 2006 crash that killed two people and left a third victim with permanent brain damage, an Illinois county settled the three claims for $ 15.5 million. Apparently, a sheriff&apos;s deputy slammed into the automobile being...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Auto Accidents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="autoaccidents" label="Auto Accidents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="districtofcolumbia" label="District of Columbia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="maryland" label="Maryland" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; FONT-SIZE: 12pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"><font color="#000000"><a href="http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-auto-accident-lawyer/what-to-do-after-an-accident.html">http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-auto-accident-lawyer/what-to-do-after-an-accident.html</a>In an accident involving a 2006 crash that killed two people and left a third victim with permanent brain damage, an <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Illinois</st1:place></st1:State> county settled the three claims for $ 15.5 million. Apparently, a sheriff's deputy slammed into the automobile being operated by one of the injured parties. Although wrongful death claims vary from state to state, <st1:State w:st="on">Maryland</st1:State> and the <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">District of Columbia</st1:place></st1:State> do recognize wrongful death and survival action claims. There are procedurally and substantive differences between the jurisdictions but essentially they are to compensate the estate for any burial expenses, and medical bills, any conscious pain and suffering and in <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Maryland</st1:place></st1:State> any grief. Lost wage claims are perhaps more significant in the <st1:State w:st="on">District of Columbia</st1:State> because <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Maryland</st1:place></st1:State> limits those claims from the date of injury to the date of death. The <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">District of Columbia</st1:place></st1:State> allows lost wage claims for the amount reasonably expected to earn during the lifetime of the deceased. The <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">District of Columbia</st1:place></st1:State> does not, however, provide for grief claims. There are caps on what is called non economic damages in <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Maryland</st1:place></st1:State>. There are no such caps in the <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">District of Columbia</st1:place></st1:State>. Non economic damages usually are referred to as pain and suffering damages</font></span>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Medical malpractice resulting in cerebral palsy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2009/12/medical-malpractice-resulting-in-cerebral-palsy.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009://56.664</id>

    <published>2009-12-21T18:43:10Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-21T18:45:44Z</updated>

    <summary>A New York jury recently awarded $ 43.5 million to a woman who suffers cerebral palsy as a result of medical malpractice. The staff at the hospital failed for 10 minutes to properly resuscitate her, depriving her of oxygen for...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medical Malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="cerebral" label="Cerebral" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lawyer" label="Lawyer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="maryland" label="Maryland" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="palsy" label="Palsy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000" size="3" face="Times New Roman">A <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">New York</st1:place></st1:State> jury recently awarded $ 43.5 million to a woman who suffers <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-medical-malpractice-lawyer/cerebal-palsy-attorney.html">cerebral palsy </a>as a result of medical malpractice. The staff at the hospital failed for 10 minutes to properly resuscitate her, depriving her of oxygen for that period of time. This led to the brain damage. Unfortunately, attending physicians and other medical personnel must be prepared to act immediately in these type of situations because seconds count, not just minutes. With the technology available to doctors and nurses in a delivery room today, these events simply should not happen. This is what appears to be one of the largest verdicts ever in upstate <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">New York</st1:place></st1:State>. If you or a loved one has been the victim of medical malpractice, contact one of our attorneys today for a free legal consultation. All our attorney fees are contingent fees so there simply is no expense for you to find out if you have a claim. </font></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Large verdict in bedsore case</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2009/11/large-verdict-in-bedsore-case.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009://56.645</id>

    <published>2009-11-14T23:12:06Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-14T23:12:46Z</updated>

    <summary>A quadriplegic was recently awarded damages in the amount of $ 2.2 million by a New York judge because he developed bedsores while recovering from a spinal cord injury. Apparently the staff at a hospital failed to regularly turn the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medical Malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[A quadriplegic was recently awarded damages in the amount of $ 2.2 million by a New York judge because he developed bedsores while recovering from a spinal cord injury. Apparently the staff at a hospital failed to regularly turn the man over during his stay in the hospital. The bedsores had to be closed surgically. As a result, the quadriplegic could not participate in required physical therapy for his other injuries. Unfortunately, bedsores are often found in nursing home situations because of inadequate staffing or training.&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>If you or loved one has a claim because of bedsores resulting from <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-medical-malpractice-lawyer/maryland-medical-malpractice-lawyer.html">improper medical attention</a>, call one of our attorneys for a free consultation.&nbsp;</div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Time frame for safe blood storage</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2009/11/time-frame-for-safe-blood-storage.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009://56.543</id>

    <published>2009-11-14T18:30:05Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-14T18:30:29Z</updated>

    <summary>A recent study suggests that blood that is stored for more than 28 days before being used for transfusion may be more susceptible to infection. The study which included the time period between 2003 and 2006 indicates that people who...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medical Malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="blood" label="blood" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="malpractice" label="malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="storage" label="storage" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">A recent study suggests that blood
that is stored for more than 28 days before being used for transfusion
may be more susceptible to infection. The study which included the time
period between 2003 and 2006 indicates that people who were transfused
with blood older than 28 days were twice as likely to develop
pneumonia, urinary tract infections, heart valve infections, sepsis and
other infections.</div> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Lawsuit involving helicopter crash</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2009/10/lawsuit-involving-helicopter-crash.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009://56.542</id>

    <published>2009-10-28T17:29:07Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-14T18:29:34Z</updated>

    <summary>Two Families are suing the owner and manufacturer of a helicopter that crashed, killing the two firefighters. The named defendants are Carson Helicopters, General Electric, Columbia Helicopters, Sirkorsky Aircraft and United Technologies. The suit asks for ten million dollars as...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Serious Accidents" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="crash" label="crash" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="helicopter" label="Helicopter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lawyer" label="lawyer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Two Families are suing the owner and
manufacturer of a helicopter that crashed, killing the two
firefighters. The named defendants are Carson Helicopters, General
Electric, Columbia Helicopters, Sirkorsky Aircraft and United
Technologies. The suit asks for ten million dollars as damages.</div> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Medical malpractice involving battery</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2009/10/medical-malpractice-involving-battery.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009://56.540</id>

    <published>2009-10-27T17:27:15Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-14T18:28:15Z</updated>

    <summary>A medical malpractice lawsuit has been filed in Texas resulting from alleged hospital negligence. The allegations suggest that a 3 year old girl had a corroded lithium battery stuck in her nose and the hospital failed to take an x-ray...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medical Malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="battery" label="battery" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="malpractice" label="malpractice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="maryland" label="Maryland" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="medical" label="medical" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[A <a href="http://www.foranlaw.com/resources/maryland-medical-malpractice-lawyer/maryland-medical-malpractice-lawyer.html">medical malpractice</a> lawsuit has been filed in Texas resulting from
alleged hospital negligence. The allegations suggest that a 3 year old
girl had a corroded lithium battery stuck in her nose and the hospital
failed to take an x-ray of the noseat the initial emergency room visit
and also sprayed medicines up the nose that caused the battery to leak
acid into the nose.&nbsp;]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New drug resistant infection</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2009/10/new-drug-resistant-infection.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009://56.541</id>

    <published>2009-10-14T17:28:23Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-14T18:28:58Z</updated>

    <summary>Physicians are concerned about a new infection that appears to be drug-resistant. The new infection is called gram-negative bacteria infections such as Acinetobacter baumannii, pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. These are especially difficult to treat since they fight off even...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Damages" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="drug" label="drug" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="injury" label="injury" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lawyer" label="lawyer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        Physicians are concerned about a new infection that appears to be
drug-resistant. The new infection is called gram-negative bacteria
infections such as Acinetobacter baumannii, pseudomonas aeruginosa and
Klebsiella pneumoniae. These are especially difficult to treat since
they fight off even the most advanced antibiotics supposedly. 
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Baltimore gas spill ended in large verdict</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/2009/08/baltimore-gas-spill-ended-in-large-verdict.html" />
    <id>tag:www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com,2009://56.539</id>

    <published>2009-08-27T17:26:34Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-14T18:27:03Z</updated>

    <summary>Jurors in Maryland have rendered large verdicts against ExxonMobile for a huge gas spill in Baltimore County in 2006. The were approximately 300 plaintiffs in the lawsuit who alleged the spill caused damage to the underground water table leading to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan J. Foran</name>
        <uri>http://www.foranlaw.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Damages" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="baltimore" label="Baltimore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gas" label="gas" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spill" label="spill" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.marylandpersonalinjuryblog.com/">
        Jurors in Maryland have rendered large verdicts against ExxonMobile for
a huge gas spill in Baltimore County in 2006. The were approximately
300 plaintiffs in the lawsuit who alleged the spill caused damage to
the underground water table leading to devaluation of their property
and personal injuries as well. The jury awarded millions of dollars in
damages. 
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
